Archive.today 链接政策生变
推荐指数 35.0 NO. 025 · 2026.10.29
发布2026/10/28Score150Comments97
简介
HN 社区热议 Archive.today 存档服务未来可用性，97 条评论指向该服务近期频繁超时和 DNS 解析异常。对依赖网页存档做数据溯源、合规审计的 AI 团队，备用方案变得紧迫。
编辑判断
Archive.today 的问题不只是技术故障，而是和 Cloudflare 的 DNS 对抗持续升级——Cloudflare 的 1.1.1.1 会返回错误 IP 指向该服务，而 Google DNS 正常。很多团队没意识到自己的基础设施已经"被动失效"。
如果你用 Archive.today 做训练数据来源验证或法律存证，建议立刻检查当前 DNS 配置，并把 archive.org Wayback Machine 和 perma.cc 纳入并行方案。做爬虫合规的创业公司可以借机推自己的存档即服务，替代需求正在起来。
社区反馈
负面 74 条评论
核心争论：archive.today 是否恶意注入恶意软件及 DDoS 攻击，还是被动防御反击
Archive.today = archive.is - which is added via comment on a huge percentage of posts on HN. Link to comment explaining the discovery: https://old.reddit.com/r/Seattle/comments/1xhf6qp/archivetod... edit: Maybe I should have titled this "claim to have discovered" a
Version that doesn't require login: https://reddit.com/r/Seattle/comments/1xhf6qp/archivetoday_l... I'm confused though, it says the site injected malware into its archived form. But the HN title says archive.today injected the malware.
You said the same thing twice. “The site” == archive.today The claim is that archive.today is injecting malware into archived pages. Given some of the past behavior, this is not hard to believe.